An interesting comparison between your QMS and your Accounting
Quality Management vs Accounting!
To illustrate the importance of the QMS, try to imagine this …
Don’t make your Quality Management System give you future headaches!
… The quarterly accounts land in your inbox and it looks really good. Better than ever actually. Or rather: the last two quarterly reports look significantly better on the results page than the previous two. The company’s revenue has risen steadily and exceeds your target and budget in several areas. Very good.
A quick glance at the figures in the accounts reveals that you have cut in the area of 80% of your expenses the last two quarters. It looks a bit too good, so you call Joe in the accounting department and ask him if you have not had more expenses than the few that have been posted. “Nah …”, Joe replies, “There have been a lot of the little less expenses as always, but no one of particular importance, so we have chosen not to post them!”.
You know it. We know it. Quarterly accounts or financial statements for that matter are worth nothing unless all figures are posted. Therefore, this scenario for most of us seems completely unrealistic. All expenses, as well as income, are recorded in order for the accounts to be used as a management tool – in addition to complying with legislation. All data has to be recorded. Otherwise, the financial statements would be nothing more than useless.
However, the above scenario is still taking place. Just in another system. Namely the quality management system. How does it really look like, with the company’s quality management system?
It is difficult to make decisions on a partly-finished financial report
Fortunately, the reality is completely different from the one that this article started with. At least with regard to the accounts. The company’s accounts are a carefully prepared tool on which management makes decisions. Rational decisions on a solid data basis – namely all posts, transactions, and registrations entered in the accounts.
It would be difficult to make decisions if the accounts were semi-finished and inadequate. If employees from different departments assessed bills to either be posted or not posted based on an estimate of its importance. In that case, the company’s financial statements would appear completely useless. And could not be used as a tool for making decisions.
Unfortunately, this is true for many companies when it comes to quality management. Errors and shortcomings are not registered in a department, while only serious delays and serious customer complaints are registered in another department. It can hide problems with suppliers, materials, processes or products. Problems that ultimately results in lack of earnings.
The Management GPS
When the management of the company uses the quarterly financial statements as a GPS to assess whether the company is on the right track in terms of budgets and business plans, they always do so on the basis of carefully prepared statements.
Similarly, the company should use its quality management system to assess the company’s health. Here, management will be able to see all that can not be read directly from the financial figures in the accounts. If the expenses have risen in the accounts, one can find the explanation in the quality management system by analyzing error reports and problems with the suppliers, for example. There may have been many internal errors in the case of defective production, material waste, and wasted man-hours.
With proper registrations and implementation of the quality management system, it will be possible to find out how, and where the problems arise and what the reason for them has been. Has the problem occurred internally in the company or perhaps with, or at a supplier? With proper registrations, you can quickly find the cause of the problem and launch solutions that minimize the risk of repeating or even better completely eliminating the risk!
But it requires quality management to be a natural part of the workflow in every corner of the company. It is important to keep in mind that quality management is not just something you can add to an employees responsibility list. It is a management task and something that has to be implemented throughout the company, and this is best done if management takes the lead. The result will be a solid data-base that can be used to navigate and make decisions upon – just like the financial statements.
Deviations in the accounts always cause the warning lights to flash
Problems in the accounts are immediately discovered. The focus is on the numbers. As soon as there are discrepancies in the accounts, the warning lights flash at the management. It is an indented response pattern in any organization.
But it requires that everything is posted. It requires commitment from the management and all employees. The same applies to the quality management system when it comes to registration of errors, shortcomings, delays, and complaints. The company will first be able to detect the problems on time when everything is registered and this data is used in a proactive way as a management tool. Exactly as the company’s accounting system is used.
Oh yes, of course, it looks good on the paper if there are no deviations. That’s what everyone thinks. But the problem with the non-existing registration of deviations is that the company loses the coordinates of the GPS and instead of being able to navigate correctly, it is now navigating blindly based on perjury and guesswork. In the long run, this approach will also affect the financial accounts, but it may be too late or impossible to find the cause and therefore the solution.
“Data is only worth something when they are actually used”
Occasionally we meet skepticism when talking about quality management with management and employees in the companies. This usually has something to do with hopelessness. This occurs because the experience has shown many that all the registrations and reports that have been made never have been used anyway. Let’s compare with the accounts again – any expense in the company will always be posted in the accounts. Everybody knows that this all transactions are important to the overall accounts. The registration of any transaction large or small provides the basis for making calculations and comparisons across departments, accounts and periods.
A digital quality management system works in exactly the same way as the digital accounting system – any registration is included and has an impact on the overall result. When we perform analysis, calculations and measurements across departments, suppliers, products, processes and periods in the quality management system, each registration will be of crucial importance. For data is only worth something, if they can actually be counted on and used.
– in exactly the same way as you use the company’s accounts
There are lots of benefits for companies using their quality management system to navigate in exactly the same way they use their accounts. The management’s GPS, an integral part of the company’s workflows, where errors, shortcomings, and delays are recorded at the same level as any transaction in the accounting system.
You use Wismatix QMS Manager at the same level as you use your accounting system. It’s easy and fast to register an error and you get statistical data for product errors and deviations quickly and in real time, and when you make decisions on the basis of the factual analysis, you make the right decision on time exactly as you do when you are basing your decision making on the company accounts.
Jonatan M. Vinterbaek is a highly skilled professional with extensive experience in developing and implementing management systems across a variety of business areas. With a focus on process optimization, system effectiveness, customer and employee satisfaction, and continuous improvement of business processes, products, and services, Jonatan possesses a wealth of knowledge and practical experience in ISO 9001, ISO 13485, ISO 27001, and ISO 14001 Management Systems. In addition to his expertise in business process analysis and improvements, document management, internal and external audits, IT-security, project management, production systems, part-list systems, and improving and managing product and production documentation, Jonatan is also experienced in the implementation of ERP systems.
Jonatan is dedicated to delivering the highest level of professionalism and excellence in his work, and is committed to helping businesses achieve their goals through effective management system implementation and optimization. With his extensive experience and knowledge, Jonatan is an invaluable asset to any organization looking to enhance their management systems and achieve their business objectives.
Extensive experience with ISO 9001, ISO 13485, ISO 27001, and ISO 14001 Management Systems, business process analysis and improvements, document management, internal and external audits, IT security, project management, production systems, part-list systems, improving and managing product and production documentation and implementation of ERP systems.